Senior Manager/Associate Director

Assessment criteria — Senior Manager/Associate Director

M4 — Director

Canon-derived frames, not advice: every criterion is verbatim JobFrame canon or O*NET source text in a fixed frame, its labeled as observed or derived (O*NET joined at occupation-group grain for this profile). Each O*NET-sourced row also carries an score. Absent sources render as absent — nothing here is generated.

Evaluation criteria 30

  • 01Delivers on: Define and implement the data engineering strategy

    canon · responsibility · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 02Delivers on: Lead large-scale transformation programs

    canon · responsibility · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 03Delivers on: Manage departmental budgets, vendor relationships, and staffing

    canon · responsibility · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 04Performs to standard: Troubleshoot program and system malfunctions to restore normal functioning.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 4.24
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 05Performs to standard: Provide staff and users with assistance solving computer-related problems, such as malfunctions and program problems.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 4.05
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 06Performs to standard: Test, maintain, and monitor computer programs and systems, including coordinating the installation of computer programs and systems.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 4
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 07Performs to standard: Use the computer in the analysis and solution of business problems, such as development of integrated production and inventory control and cost analysis systems.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.97
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 08Performs to standard: Coordinate and link the computer systems within an organization to increase compatibility so that information can be shared.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.78
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 09Performs to standard: Use object-oriented programming languages, as well as client and server applications development processes and multimedia and Internet technology.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.71
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 10Performs to standard: Analyze information processing or computation needs and plan and design computer systems, using techniques such as structured analysis, data modeling, and information engineering.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.6
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 11Performs to standard: Review and analyze computer printouts and performance indicators to locate code problems, and correct errors by correcting codes.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.6
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 12Performs to standard: Consult with management to ensure agreement on system principles.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.57
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 13Performs to standard: Specify inputs accessed by the system and plan the distribution and use of the results.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.48
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 14Performs to standard: Expand or modify system to serve new purposes or improve work flow.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.47
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 15Performs to standard: Interview or survey workers, observe job performance, or perform the job to determine what information is processed and how it is processed.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.44
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 16Effectiveness at: Test computer system operations to ensure proper functioning.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 17Effectiveness at: Implement security measures for computer or information systems.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 18Effectiveness at: Collaborate with others to determine design specifications or details.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 19Effectiveness at: Collaborate with others to resolve information technology issues.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 20Effectiveness at: Analyze data to identify trends or relationships among variables.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 21Effectiveness at: Analyze data to identify or resolve operational problems.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 22Effectiveness at: Create databases to store electronic data.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 23Effectiveness at: Install computer software.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 24Effectiveness at: Recommend changes to improve computer or information systems.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 25Effectiveness at: Modify software programs to improve performance.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 26Effectiveness at: Update knowledge about emerging industry or technology trends.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 27Effectiveness at: Write computer programming code.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 28Effectiveness at: Troubleshoot issues with computer applications or systems.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 29Effectiveness at: Develop computer or information security policies or procedures.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 30Effectiveness at: Evaluate utility of software or hardware technologies.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

Performance standards at this level 21

What good looks like at this level, by dimension — verbatim level and JFM rubric text, with this profile's performance metrics attached where a real keyword match exists. Work activities are O*NET-derived (basis: derived).

  • Scope

    canon · level dimension · observed

    A function or department

  • Autonomy

    canon · level dimension · observed

    Owns area strategy and budget

  • Complexity

    canon · level dimension · observed

    Strategic priorities and cross-functional alignment

  • Impact

    canon · level dimension · observed

    Function-level results

  • Decision rights

    canon · level dimension · observed

    Owns strategy, budget, and org design for the area

  • Leadership

    canon · level dimension · observed

    Leads managers; sets direction for the function

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Test computer system operations to ensure proper functioning.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Implement security measures for computer or information systems.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Collaborate with others to determine design specifications or details.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Collaborate with others to resolve information technology issues.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Analyze data to identify trends or relationships among variables.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Analyze data to identify or resolve operational problems.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Create databases to store electronic data.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Install computer software.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Recommend changes to improve computer or information systems.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Modify software programs to improve performance.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Update knowledge about emerging industry or technology trends.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Write computer programming code.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Troubleshoot issues with computer applications or systems.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Develop computer or information security policies or procedures.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Evaluate utility of software or hardware technologies.

Structured-interview dimensions

The work-style constructs a structured interview for this occupation should probe (importance-ranked). Pair with past-behavior questions and anchored rating scales — the evidence-backed format.

Attention to Detail2.79Leadership Orientation2.58Dependability2.45Intellectual Curiosity2.34Innovation2.27Integrity2.25Cautiousness2.22Adaptability2.01

Level-calibrated behavioral anchors 9

Verbatim anchors from open leveled frameworks, mapped onto this profile's level (basis: derived — competency-scoped, not per-criterion). Use them to calibrate what "exceeds / meets" looks like at this level.

  • Seeing the Big Picture

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

    Understand the strategic drivers for your area of work. Align activities to contribute to wider organisational priorities. Remain alert to emerging issues and trends which might impact your work area. Seek out and share experiences to develop knowledge of the team’s business area. Understand how the strategies and activities of the team create value and meet the diverse needs of all stakeholders.

  • Changing and Improving

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

    Work with others to identify areas for improvement and simplify processes to use fewer resources. Use technology where possible to increase efficiency. Encourage ideas for change from a wide range of sources. Clearly explain the reasons for change to colleagues and how to implement them, supporting individuals with different needs to adapt to change. Encourage an environment where colleagues know that they can challenge decisions and issues safely. Take managed risks by fully considering the varied impacts changes could have on the diverse range of end users.

  • Making Effective Decisions

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

    Understand own level of responsibility and empower others to make decisions where appropriate. Analyse and use a range of relevant, credible information from internal and external sources to support decisions. Invite challenge and where appropriate involve others in decision making. Display confidence when making difficult decisions, even if they prove to be unpopular. Consult with others to ensure the potential impacts on end users have been considered. Present strong recommendations in a timely manner outlining the consideration of other options, costs, benefits and risks.

  • Leadership

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

    Ensure colleagues and stakeholders have a clear understanding of objectives, activities and time-frames. Take into account different individual needs, views, and ideas, championing inclusion and equality of opportunity for all. Consider the impacts of own and team’s activities on stakeholders and end users. Role-model commitment and satisfaction with role. Recognise and praise the achievements of others to drive positivity within the team. Effectively manage conflict, misconduct and non-inclusive behaviour, raising with senior managers where appropriate.

  • Communicating and Influencing

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

    Communicate in a straightforward, honest and engaging manner, choosing appropriate styles to maximise understanding and impact. Encourage the use of different communication methods, including digital resources and highlight the benefits, including ensuring cost effectiveness. Ensure communication has a clear purpose and takes into account people’s individual needs. Share information as appropriate and check understanding. Show positivity and enthusiasm towards work, encouraging others to do the same. Ensure that important messages are communicated with colleagues and stakeholders respectfully, taking into consideration the diversity of interests.

  • Working Together

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

    Encourage joined up team work within own team and across other groups. Establish professional relationships with a range of stakeholders. Collaborate with these to share information, resources and support. Invest time to develop a common focus and genuine positive team spirit where colleagues feel valued and respect one another. Put in place support for the wellbeing of individuals within the team, including consideration of your own needs. Make it clear to all team members that bullying, harassment and discrimination are unacceptable. Actively seek and consider input of people from diverse backgrounds and perspectives.

  • Developing Self and Others

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

    Identify capability gaps for self and team. Ensure development objectives are set and achieved to address any gaps and enable delivery of current and future work. Take time to coach, mentor and develop other colleagues to support succession planning. Promote inclusiveness by respecting different personal needs in the team and use these to develop others. Reflect on own work, continuously seek and act on feedback to improve own and team’s performance.

  • Managing a Quality Service

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

    Develop, implement, maintain and review systems and services to ensure delivery of professional excellence. Work with stakeholders to set priorities, objectives and timescales. Successfully deliver high quality outcomes that meet the customers’ needs and gives value for money. Identify risks and resolve issues efficiently. Involve a diverse range of colleagues, stakeholders and delivery partners in developing suggestions for improvements. Establish ways to find and respond to feedback from customers about the services provided.

  • Delivering at Pace

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

    Show a positive approach to keeping the whole team’s efforts focused on the top priorities. Promote a culture of following the appropriate procedures to ensure results are achieved on time whilst still enabling innovation. Ensure the most appropriate resources are available for colleagues to use to do their job effectively. Regularly monitor your own and team’s work against milestones ensuring individual needs are considered when setting tasks. Act promptly to reassess workloads and priorities when there are conflicting demands to maintain performance. Allow individuals the space and authority to meet objectives, providing additional support where necessary, whilst keeping overall responsibility.

This page includes information from the O*NET 30.3 Database by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). Used under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). O*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA. USDOL/ETA has modified all or some of this information. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed, or tested these modifications.

Own the full kit — $29

The complete work-products kit for one canonical job profile: level-scoped evaluation criteria with BARS frames, structured-interview dimensions and guide, performance criteria, and goal/scorecard templates — all canon-grounded and basis-labeled.

Assessment Kit — One Profile

$29

The complete work-products kit for one canonical job profile: level-scoped evaluation criteria with BARS frames, structured-interview dimensions and guide, performance criteria, and goal/scorecard templates — all canon-grounded and basis-labeled.

Assessment Kit — Family Bundle

$99

Work-products kits for every level and focus in one job family — the hiring-manager shape: assess, interview, and set goals across the whole ladder consistently.

Assessment Kits — All Access (Monthly)

$49/mo

Every work-products kit across all canonical profiles, refreshed as source editions land.

Assessment Kits — All Access (Annual)

$490/yr

Every work-products kit across all canonical profiles, refreshed as source editions land. Annual billing (two months free).

This page is the kit's free demonstration and stays free. The paid kit is the complete work-products export for the profile.