Clinical Trial Manager / Project Manager I

Assessment criteria — Clinical Trial Manager / Project Manager I

M2 — Manager II

Canon-derived frames, not advice: every criterion is verbatim JobFrame canon or O*NET source text in a fixed frame, its labeled as observed or derived (O*NET joined at occupation-group grain for this profile). Each O*NET-sourced row also carries an score. Absent sources render as absent — nothing here is generated.

Evaluation criteria 30

  • 01Delivers on: Create detailed operational plans

    canon · responsibility · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 02Delivers on: Negotiate site budgets

    canon · responsibility · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 03Delivers on: Manage vendors day-to-day

    canon · responsibility · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 04Performs to standard: Inspect food processing areas to ensure compliance with government regulations and standards for sanitation, safety, quality, and waste management.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 4.38
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 05Performs to standard: Check raw ingredients for maturity or stability for processing, and finished products for safety, quality, and nutritional value.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 4.18
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 06Performs to standard: Study methods to improve aspects of foods, such as chemical composition, flavor, color, texture, nutritional value, and convenience.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 4.18
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 07Performs to standard: Develop food standards and production specifications, safety and sanitary regulations, and waste management and water supply specifications.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 4.14
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 08Performs to standard: Stay up to date on new regulations and current events regarding food science by reviewing scientific literature.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 4
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 09Performs to standard: Study the structure and composition of food or the changes foods undergo in storage and processing.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 4
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 10Performs to standard: Confer with process engineers, plant operators, flavor experts, and packaging and marketing specialists to resolve problems in product development.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 4
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 11Performs to standard: Test new products for flavor, texture, color, nutritional content, and adherence to government and industry standards.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.91
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 12Performs to standard: Develop new food items for production, based on consumer feedback.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.81
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 13Performs to standard: Develop new or improved ways of preserving, processing, packaging, storing, and delivering foods, using knowledge of chemistry, microbiology, and other sciences.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.76
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 14Performs to standard: Evaluate food processing and storage operations and assist in the development of quality assurance programs for such operations.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.73
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 15Performs to standard: Demonstrate products to clients.

    O*NET task · observed · IM 3.35
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 16Effectiveness at: Prepare scientific or technical reports or presentations.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 17Effectiveness at: Record research or operational data.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 18Effectiveness at: Supervise scientific or technical personnel.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 19Effectiveness at: Interpret research or operational data.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 20Effectiveness at: Review professional literature to maintain professional knowledge.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 21Effectiveness at: Maintain laboratory or technical equipment.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 22Effectiveness at: Collect information from people through observation, interviews, or surveys.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 23Effectiveness at: Train personnel in technical or scientific procedures.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 24Effectiveness at: Monitor operational procedures in technical environments to ensure conformance to standards.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 25Effectiveness at: Analyze environmental data.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 26Effectiveness at: Collect environmental data or samples.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 27Effectiveness at: Communicate results of environmental research.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 28Effectiveness at: Advise others on matters of public policy.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 29Effectiveness at: Measure environmental characteristics.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

  • 30Effectiveness at: Test quality of materials or finished products.

    O*NET work activity · observed
    Rating frame (5-point )
    5 · Exceeds
    — rating anchor pending —
    3 · Meets
    — rating anchor pending —
    1 · Below
    — rating anchor pending —

    Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

Performance standards at this level 21

What good looks like at this level, by dimension — verbatim level and JFM rubric text, with this profile's performance metrics attached where a real keyword match exists. Work activities are O*NET-derived (basis: derived).

  • Scope

    canon · level dimension · observed

    An established team or sub-function

  • Autonomy

    canon · level dimension · observed

    Owns planning for the group

  • Complexity

    canon · level dimension · observed

    Cross-project coordination and priorities

  • Impact

    canon · level dimension · observed

    Group delivery and development

  • Decision rights

    canon · level dimension · observed

    Owns staffing, priorities, performance for the group

  • Leadership

    canon · level dimension · observed

    Manages a team; sometimes manages leads

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Prepare scientific or technical reports or presentations.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Record research or operational data.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Supervise scientific or technical personnel.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Interpret research or operational data.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Review professional literature to maintain professional knowledge.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Maintain laboratory or technical equipment.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Collect information from people through observation, interviews, or surveys.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Train personnel in technical or scientific procedures.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Monitor operational procedures in technical environments to ensure conformance to standards.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Analyze environmental data.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Collect environmental data or samples.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Communicate results of environmental research.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Advise others on matters of public policy.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Measure environmental characteristics.

  • Work activities

    O*NET work activity · derived

    Effectiveness at: Test quality of materials or finished products.

Structured-interview dimensions

The work-style constructs a structured interview for this occupation should probe (importance-ranked). Pair with past-behavior questions and anchored rating scales — the evidence-backed format.

Empathy2.68Attention to Detail2.61Intellectual Curiosity2.5Sincerity2.4Dependability2.37Social Orientation2.32Innovation2.26Stress Tolerance2.21

Level-calibrated behavioral anchors 9

Verbatim anchors from open leveled frameworks, mapped onto this profile's level (basis: derived — competency-scoped, not per-criterion). Use them to calibrate what "exceeds / meets" looks like at this level.

  • Seeing the Big Picture

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · EO or equivalent

    Understand how your work and the work of your team supports wider objectives and meets the diverse needs of stakeholders. Keep up to date with the issues that affect your work area. Take a keen interest in expanding knowledge in areas related to your work. Focus on overall goals and not just specific tasks to meet priorities.

  • Changing and Improving

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · EO or equivalent

    Regularly review own and team’s work and take the initiative to suggest ideas to make improvements. Give feedback on changes in a constructive manner. Take a positive, open approach to the possibility of change and encourage others to do the same. Help others to understand changes and the reasons they are being put in place. Identify and act on the effects changes are having on your role and that of the team. Look for ways to use technology to achieve efficient and effective results. Consider accessibility needs of the diverse range of end users.

  • Making Effective Decisions

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · EO or equivalent

    Take responsibility for making effective and fair decisions, in a timely manner. Analyse and research further information to support decisions. Talk to relevant people to get advice and information when unsure how to proceed. Explain how decisions have been reached in a clear and concise way, both verbally and in writing. Demonstrate the consideration of all options, costs, risks and wider implications, including the diverse needs of end users and any accessibility requirements.

  • Leadership

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · EO or equivalent

    Show pride and passion for your work and positive, inclusive engagement with your team. Understand your areas of responsibility and display awareness of the wider impact of your actions. Proactively role model and promote an inclusive workplace, promptly dealing with inappropriate language and behaviours when they arise, including any instances of discrimination or misconduct. Give praise and credit to colleagues and stakeholders where appropriate.

  • Communicating and Influencing

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · EO or equivalent

    Communicate clearly and concisely both orally and in writing. Take time to consider the best communication channel to use for the audience, including making the best of digital resources and considering value for money. Interact with others in an enthusiastic way. Express ideas clearly and with respect for others. Listen to and value different ideas, views and ways of working. Respond constructively and objectively to comments and questions. Handle challenging conversations with confidence and sensitivity.

  • Working Together

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · EO or equivalent

    Develop a range of contacts outside own team and identify opportunities to share knowledge, information and learning. Show genuine interest when listening to others. Contribute to an inclusive working environment where all opinions and challenges are listened to and all individual needs are taken into account. Ensure it is clear that bullying, harassment and discrimination are unacceptable. Offer support and help to colleagues when in need, including consideration of your own and their wellbeing. Change ways of working to aid cooperation within and between teams in order to achieve results.

  • Developing Self and Others

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · EO or equivalent

    Identify gaps in own and team’s skills and knowledge. Set and consistently meet development objectives. Seek learning opportunities. Support the development plans of all colleagues, recognising how diversity of experience/background can help to build an inclusive team culture. Consider the contributions of all team members and delegate work to aid the learning and development of all. Encourage and listen to developmental feedback from colleagues.

  • Managing a Quality Service

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · EO or equivalent

    Work with customers to understand their needs and expectations. Create clear plans and set priorities which meet the needs of both the customer and the business. Clearly explain to customers what can be done. Keep colleagues and stakeholders fully informed of plans, possibilities and progress. Identify common problems that affect service, report them and find possible solutions. Deliver good customer service which balances quality and cost effectiveness.

  • Delivering at Pace

    UK Civil Service Success Profiles · EO or equivalent

    Regularly review the success of activities in the team to identify barriers to progress or challenging objectives. Identify who and what is required to ensure success, set clear goals and areas of responsibility and continually assess workloads considering individual needs. Follow relevant policies, procedures and legislation to complete your work. Ensure colleagues have the correct tools and resources available to them to do their jobs. Have a positive and focused attitude to achieving outcomes, despite any setbacks. Regularly check performance against objectives, making suggestions for improvement or taking corrective action where necessary. Ensure that colleagues are supported where tasks are challenging.

This page includes information from the O*NET 30.3 Database by the U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration (USDOL/ETA). Used under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). O*NET® is a trademark of USDOL/ETA. USDOL/ETA has modified all or some of this information. USDOL/ETA has not approved, endorsed, or tested these modifications.

Own the full kit — $29

The complete work-products kit for one canonical job profile: level-scoped evaluation criteria with BARS frames, structured-interview dimensions and guide, performance criteria, and goal/scorecard templates — all canon-grounded and basis-labeled.

Assessment Kit — One Profile

$29

The complete work-products kit for one canonical job profile: level-scoped evaluation criteria with BARS frames, structured-interview dimensions and guide, performance criteria, and goal/scorecard templates — all canon-grounded and basis-labeled.

Assessment Kit — Family Bundle

$99

Work-products kits for every level and focus in one job family — the hiring-manager shape: assess, interview, and set goals across the whole ladder consistently.

Assessment Kits — All Access (Monthly)

$49/mo

Every work-products kit across all canonical profiles, refreshed as source editions land.

Assessment Kits — All Access (Annual)

$490/yr

Every work-products kit across all canonical profiles, refreshed as source editions land. Annual billing (two months free).

This page is the kit's free demonstration and stays free. The paid kit is the complete work-products export for the profile.