Assessment criteria — Aerospace Engineering — Senior Professional

Evaluation criteria 34

• 01Delivers on: Lead design of major aerospace systems

  canon · responsibility · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 02Delivers on: Solve complex technical challenges

  canon · responsibility · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 03Delivers on: Provide strategic design guidance

  canon · responsibility · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 04Delivers on: Oversee project execution

  canon · responsibility · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 05Delivers on: Ensure alignment with organizational goals

  canon · responsibility · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 06Delivers on: Drive innovation in design processes

  canon · responsibility · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 07Delivers on: Collaborate with senior leadership

  canon · responsibility · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 08Delivers on: Mentor and develop engineering talent

  canon · responsibility · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 09Delivers on: Conduct high-level technical reviews

  canon · responsibility · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 10Delivers on: Represent the organization in technical forums

  canon · responsibility · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 11Performs to standard: Formulate mathematical models or other methods of computer analysis to develop, evaluate, or modify design, according to customer engineering requirements.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 4.07
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 12Performs to standard: Plan or conduct experimental, environmental, operational, or stress tests on models or prototypes of aircraft or aerospace systems or equipment.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 4
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 13Performs to standard: Formulate conceptual design of aeronautical or aerospace products or systems to meet customer requirements or conform to environmental regulations.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 3.88
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 14Performs to standard: Plan or coordinate investigation and resolution of customers' reports of technical problems with aircraft or aerospace vehicles.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 3.88
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 15Performs to standard: Write technical reports or other documentation, such as handbooks or bulletins, for use by engineering staff, management, or customers.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 3.83
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 16Performs to standard: Direct or coordinate activities of engineering or technical personnel involved in designing, fabricating, modifying, or testing of aircraft or aerospace products.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 3.81
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 17Performs to standard: Diagnose performance problems by reviewing reports or documentation from customers or field engineers or by inspecting malfunctioning or damaged products.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 3.81
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 18Performs to standard: Evaluate product data or design from inspections or reports for conformance to engineering principles, customer requirements, environmental regulations, or quality standards.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 3.78
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 19Performs to standard: Direct aerospace research and development programs.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 3.49
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 20Performs to standard: Develop design criteria for aeronautical or aerospace products or systems, including testing methods, production costs, quality standards, environmental standards, or completion dates.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 3.43
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 21Performs to standard: Analyze project requests, proposals, or engineering data to determine feasibility, productibility, cost, or production time of aerospace or aeronautical products.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 3.41
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 22Performs to standard: Maintain records of performance reports for future reference.

  O*NET task · observed · IM 3.27
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 23Effectiveness at: Create models of engineering designs or methods.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 24Effectiveness at: Test performance of electrical, electronic, mechanical, or integrated systems or equipment.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 25Effectiveness at: Design electromechanical equipment or systems.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 26Effectiveness at: Direct quality control activities.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 27Effectiveness at: Prepare procedural documents.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 28Effectiveness at: Direct design or development activities.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 29Effectiveness at: Investigate system, equipment, or product failures.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 30Effectiveness at: Inspect equipment or systems.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 31Effectiveness at: Evaluate designs or specifications to ensure quality.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 32Effectiveness at: Determine design criteria or specifications.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 33Effectiveness at: Analyze design or requirements information for mechanical equipment or systems.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

• 34Effectiveness at: Maintain operational records or records systems.

  O*NET work activity · observed
  Rating frame (5-point BARS)

  5 · Exceeds

  — rating anchor pending —

  3 · Meets

  — rating anchor pending —

  1 · Below

  — rating anchor pending —

  Rating anchors are completed by the rater against observed behavior — leveled anchor text lands with the next source edition.

Performance standards at this level 18

What good looks like at this level, by dimension — verbatim level and JFM rubric text, with this profile's performance metrics attached where a real keyword match exists. Work activities are O*NET-derived (basis: derived).

• Scope

  canon · level dimension · observed

  A system or set of related features

• Autonomy

  canon · level dimension · observed

  Self-directed; reviewed at critical decision points

• Complexity

  canon · level dimension · observed

  Complex, ambiguous problems; devises new approaches

• Impact

  canon · level dimension · observed

  Multi-team / function outcomes

• Decision rights

  canon · level dimension · observed

  Owns technical decisions for a system; influences adjacent design

• Leadership

  canon · level dimension · observed

  Technical lead for focused efforts; mentors several

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Create models of engineering designs or methods.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Test performance of electrical, electronic, mechanical, or integrated systems or equipment.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Design electromechanical equipment or systems.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Direct quality control activities.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Prepare procedural documents.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Direct design or development activities.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Investigate system, equipment, or product failures.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Inspect equipment or systems.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Evaluate designs or specifications to ensure quality.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Determine design criteria or specifications.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Analyze design or requirements information for mechanical equipment or systems.

• Work activities

  O*NET work activity · derived

  Effectiveness at: Maintain operational records or records systems.

Structured-interview dimensions

The work-style constructs a structured interview for this occupation should probe (importance-ranked). Pair with past-behavior questions and anchored rating scales — the evidence-backed format.

Level-calibrated behavioral anchors 9

Verbatim anchors from open leveled frameworks, mapped onto this profile's level (basis: derived — competency-scoped, not per-criterion). Use them to calibrate what "exceeds / meets" looks like at this level.

• Seeing the Big Picture

  UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

  Understand the strategic drivers for your area of work. Align activities to contribute to wider organisational priorities. Remain alert to emerging issues and trends which might impact your work area. Seek out and share experiences to develop knowledge of the team’s business area. Understand how the strategies and activities of the team create value and meet the diverse needs of all stakeholders.

• Changing and Improving

  UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

  Work with others to identify areas for improvement and simplify processes to use fewer resources. Use technology where possible to increase efficiency. Encourage ideas for change from a wide range of sources. Clearly explain the reasons for change to colleagues and how to implement them, supporting individuals with different needs to adapt to change. Encourage an environment where colleagues know that they can challenge decisions and issues safely. Take managed risks by fully considering the varied impacts changes could have on the diverse range of end users.

• Making Effective Decisions

  UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

  Understand own level of responsibility and empower others to make decisions where appropriate. Analyse and use a range of relevant, credible information from internal and external sources to support decisions. Invite challenge and where appropriate involve others in decision making. Display confidence when making difficult decisions, even if they prove to be unpopular. Consult with others to ensure the potential impacts on end users have been considered. Present strong recommendations in a timely manner outlining the consideration of other options, costs, benefits and risks.

• Leadership

  UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

  Ensure colleagues and stakeholders have a clear understanding of objectives, activities and time-frames. Take into account different individual needs, views, and ideas, championing inclusion and equality of opportunity for all. Consider the impacts of own and team’s activities on stakeholders and end users. Role-model commitment and satisfaction with role. Recognise and praise the achievements of others to drive positivity within the team. Effectively manage conflict, misconduct and non-inclusive behaviour, raising with senior managers where appropriate.

• Communicating and Influencing

  UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

  Communicate in a straightforward, honest and engaging manner, choosing appropriate styles to maximise understanding and impact. Encourage the use of different communication methods, including digital resources and highlight the benefits, including ensuring cost effectiveness. Ensure communication has a clear purpose and takes into account people’s individual needs. Share information as appropriate and check understanding. Show positivity and enthusiasm towards work, encouraging others to do the same. Ensure that important messages are communicated with colleagues and stakeholders respectfully, taking into consideration the diversity of interests.

• Working Together

  UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

  Encourage joined up team work within own team and across other groups. Establish professional relationships with a range of stakeholders. Collaborate with these to share information, resources and support. Invest time to develop a common focus and genuine positive team spirit where colleagues feel valued and respect one another. Put in place support for the wellbeing of individuals within the team, including consideration of your own needs. Make it clear to all team members that bullying, harassment and discrimination are unacceptable. Actively seek and consider input of people from diverse backgrounds and perspectives.

• Developing Self and Others

  UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

  Identify capability gaps for self and team. Ensure development objectives are set and achieved to address any gaps and enable delivery of current and future work. Take time to coach, mentor and develop other colleagues to support succession planning. Promote inclusiveness by respecting different personal needs in the team and use these to develop others. Reflect on own work, continuously seek and act on feedback to improve own and team’s performance.

• Managing a Quality Service

  UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

  Develop, implement, maintain and review systems and services to ensure delivery of professional excellence. Work with stakeholders to set priorities, objectives and timescales. Successfully deliver high quality outcomes that meet the customers’ needs and gives value for money. Identify risks and resolve issues efficiently. Involve a diverse range of colleagues, stakeholders and delivery partners in developing suggestions for improvements. Establish ways to find and respond to feedback from customers about the services provided.

• Delivering at Pace

  UK Civil Service Success Profiles · HEO and SEO or equivalent

  Show a positive approach to keeping the whole team’s efforts focused on the top priorities. Promote a culture of following the appropriate procedures to ensure results are achieved on time whilst still enabling innovation. Ensure the most appropriate resources are available for colleagues to use to do their job effectively. Regularly monitor your own and team’s work against milestones ensuring individual needs are considered when setting tasks. Act promptly to reassess workloads and priorities when there are conflicting demands to maintain performance. Allow individuals the space and authority to meet objectives, providing additional support where necessary, whilst keeping overall responsibility.